After the COVID-19 pandemic stopped many asylum procedures across Europe, new technologies have become reviving these kinds of systems. Via lie detection tools examined at the boundary to a program for validating documents and transcribes selection interviews, a wide range of technologies is being utilized for asylum applications. This article explores how these solutions have reshaped the ways asylum procedures are conducted. This reveals just how asylum seekers are transformed into obligated hindered techno-users: They are asked to conform to a series www.ascella-llc.com/what-is-the-due-diligence-data-room/ of techno-bureaucratic steps also to keep up with unstable tiny changes in criteria and deadlines. This obstructs the capacity to work these devices and to pursue their right for protection.
It also demonstrates how these types of technologies happen to be embedded in refugee governance: They help in the ‘circuits of financial-humanitarianism’ that function through a whirlwind of dispersed technological requirements. These requirements increase asylum seekers’ socio-legal precarity simply by hindering these people from opening the stations of safety. It further states that analyses of securitization and victimization should be put together with an insight in the disciplinary mechanisms these technologies, in which migrants will be turned into data-generating subjects who are disciplined by their reliance on technology.
Drawing on Foucault’s notion of power/knowledge and comarcal understanding, the article states that these systems have an natural obstructiveness. They have a double impact: when they assist with expedite the asylum method, they also generate it difficult meant for refugees to navigate these systems. They are positioned in a ‘knowledge deficit’ that makes them vulnerable to illegitimate decisions created by non-governmental stars, and ill-informed and unreliable narratives about their circumstances. Moreover, that they pose new risks of’machine mistakes’ that may result in erroneous or discriminatory outcomes.
